#How to install glibc 2.29 Patch#
#How to install glibc 2.29 full#

#How to install glibc 2.29 Patch#

Ld behaviors and patch LLD when needed' :(įor an undefined symbol, there is only this form: a defined symbol, both (non-default sometimes calledįor a defined symbol named it only resolves an undefined LLD has evolved to the current state after contributors 'observe GNU There is no good documentation on the linker behavior. Symbol versioning is complex -) While the runtime behavior isĭocumented by Linux Standard Base Core Specification, Generic Part, > Because I don't have a high precision requirement so they would all be

> possible the latest version available on the system. > want exp from glibc 2.2 or 2.29, I just want the exp symbol, and if > On the other hand, I don't understand why I have to specify that I I even recompiled with -fveclib=none but it did not change anything.Īnd I believe that -fveclib=mvec will start working with LLVM-12. Which is strange because the target is not using build-clang.64]$ ldd VstPlugins/libPodolski.so usr/lib/libm.so.6: shared definition of reference to the dependency is being pulled by libmvec. usr/lib/libm.so.6: shared definition of shared definition of exp Projects/Podolski/CMakeFiles/Podolski.dir/_/_/AudioModulesFrame/AM_: Projects/Podolski/CMakeFiles/Podolski.dir/_/_/libs/tinyexpr/tinyexpr.c.o: LLVM Developers mailing I managed to install llvm 11 on the server and got more information

#How to install glibc 2.29 full#

Maybe lld never supported it, and now it is using lld to link insteadĪnyway, I'd like to solve this with the LLVM tools while full LTO is Is there a better approach to this problem? U first I thought that it was due to LTO, but even after disabling

Nm -D /home/abique/.u-he/Zebra2/ Zebra2.64.so | grep GLIBC.*29 _asm_('.symver after updating clang and re-creating the cmake build directory itĭoes not work anymore and I have dependencies toward glibc 2.29: So far I've been able to target older glibc by having a C file containing: I have a machine which is up to date (glibc 2.32 and clang+lld 10.0.1). I wonder what is the right way to target an old glibc?